On top of the lies carelessly broadcast by Project Fear we now have emotional blackmail. Nicky Morgan, Education Secretary, warns us that:
“if Britain leaves Europe it will be young people who suffer the most… everyone who casts their vote must understand that. If parents and grandparents vote to leave, they’ll be voting to gamble with their children and grandchildren’s future.”
On the contrary. Nicky Morgan was hardly born at the time of the last referendum, and clearly has no conception of what she is talking about. It is those parents and grandparents who by their vote 40 years ago conspired to surrender Britain’s independence. The least they can do now — for the future of their children and grandchildren — is to help atone for that historic error, and reclaim the sovereignty so shamefully compromised.
And on the subject of lies… Des anyone know if Cameron’s “legally binding” (ie worthless) agreement has been deposited as promised at the United Nations? We can find — unsurprisingly — no mention of it on their website.
Yesterday in the Daily Telegraph, Mehreen Khan reported the Dutch bank ING’s claim that Britain leaving the European Union would ‘wipe off’ up to 0.3 per cent of GDP from the euro’s 19 economies in less than two years.
0.3 per cent! Three parts in a thousand! It is difficult to express the horror that that such a prospect evokes. Perhaps.
Governments do not create growth in GDP, still less does the EU. Economic growth results from free agents — corporations and individuals — contracting agreements to purchase and supply with each other. The best that governments can do is facilitate a level playing field for free exchange, and minimize economic distortions — through tax for example.
According to the Centre for Economics and Business Research, Britain will become the world’s fourth largest economy — ahead of Germany and Japan — in the next twenty years. According to IMF estimates, UK GDP will increase from $2.7 trillion in 2015 to $6.0 trillion in 2035. Our children and grandchildren will be — more or less — twice as wealthy as we are in twenty years’ time.
0.3 per cent off GDP in the eurozone is rather beside the point.
We often see complaints — from pundits, journalists and private individuals — that they don’t have sufficient facts to inform a decision on whether or not Britain should leave the European Union. This is curious, since there is a massive amount of information available to those who care to do their own research and form their own conclusions. But it is also true that fundamentally there is only one fact and one judgement which matter.
The fact is that the future is uncertain. Whatever the result of the referendum, we shall never know whether the alternative route which could have been taken would have been better. GDP up or down a bit? Trade deals more or less advantageous? Border control stronger or weaker? Who knows? The fundamental judgement, however, is that managing this uncertainty to the benefit of Britain will be more effective if the British people rather than the Brussels apparatchiks control it.
There’s a great deal of research about the interaction of rationality and emotion in decision-making. In routine, everyday decisions, it makes sense to use rational evaluation. But in the big decisions, emotions should and do carry the day. Do you want to be governed by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels or — despite their many faults — by your own elected representatives? Simple, no?
*Apparently, Joe Friday never actually said this line in Dragnet.
It is important to stay focused on the big picture, on the principled reasons for leaving the European Union. However, many people are — understandably — concerned about the potential impact on them personally.
We have close contacts with a number of British expatriates living in continental Europe. They are worried about whether they will still be able to live in France or Spain; about their continued access to healthcare; about whether they might even be forced to sell up and return to Britain. Cameron and his cronies are trying to exacerbate those fears, but without going so far as actually to endorse them. Because the fact is that those fears are groundless.
The key principle is that of executed rights, or acquired rights, as established in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. This provides that “Withdrawal from a treaty does not affect any right, obligation or legal situation of the parties created through the execution of the treaty prior to its termination”. All current ex-pats will continue to enjoy all the rights and freedoms which they chose to exercise before Britain decided to leave the EU. There will be no change to their situation, whatever the result of the referendum.
What of our children and grandchildren? What rights will they have? No-one can predict how the law might evolve in the future. But continued access to the EU Single Market will imply continued freedom of movement. And Britons have lived happily in France, Spain, Portugal, Italy for generations past. Why otherwise is the Promenade des Anglais in Nice so-called?
If Project Fear prevails, and we lose this referendum, the issue of Britain’s relationship with the European Union will not go away. The Crown in Parliament will remain sovereign, and will sooner or later reassert that sovereignty — either because the British people will finally demand it, or because the European Union will collapse, as all supranational empires do.
But there will be other unfinished business. Principally, this will turn on how to reconstruct our democracy so that our political class serve us rather than aspire to act as our masters; so that they respect rather than despise the heritage they should serve; so that they can never again surrender. And further, on how we can replace the now-unsustainable post-war European social-democratic consensus before it destroys our economic and social existence.
On Sunday 28 February, The Observer published a thoughtful article, which concluded:
Project Fear may well be the right strategy for the Remain campaign to secure victory, but it does not answer the question of how mainstream politicians can speak to those disaffected voters who helped trigger this referendum. How do you help people cope with the unequal impacts of globalisation, demographic change and technological progress? How can people begin to trust again in a market economy that seems, in places, to be rigged by ever larger global firms that have an uncanny ability to reduce their tax liabilities; how can they feel confident again in a form of late capitalism where benefits seem to accrue unevenly to a smaller and smaller number of people?
These issues will remain to be addressed whether we win or lose the referendum. Georges Clemenceau, Prime Minister of France, famously argued, “La guerre! C’est une chose trop grave pour la confier à des militaires.” This is usually rendered as, “War is too important to be left to the generals.” We can say too that politics is too important to be left to the politicians.
The Remain camp are beginning to realise that the battle is being read as elites vs the people, politicians vs electors, big business vs small employers. And they’re worried.
The initial strategy involved lining up influential groups and spokesmen day after day to argue for remaining, and to ramp up fear at the prospect of leaving. Osborne even managed to hijack the G20 communique from Shanghai to include a reference to “the shock of a potential UK exit from the European Union”. But it isn’t working. Politico reports that Cameron’s adviser Daniel Korski has said that Number 10 now wants to discourage banks and big business from speaking up too loudly in support of EU membership.
Claim and counter-claim will be thrown around relentlessly over the next four months. Most of it, especially forecasts of future impacts on domestic GDP, will be beside the point: the future is by definition unknowable. But what will clearly be to the point is whom to trust. An increasingly rattled and desperate Cameron, driven on by multinational businesses, insolvent banks and self-serving politicians, is not scoring highly in the trust stakes.
The British people don’t like to be told what to do by those who presume to be their betters. Our reaction, cussed or stubborn, is to resist. The referendum will give the people a chance to say: No. We don’t believe you. We don’t trust you. We want to run our own country again. We can have a brighter future than your miserable and defeatist scare-mongering suggests.